The main issue with QD-OLED displays is that they lack a polarizing layer, which causes the black levels to raise when there's ambient light on them. However, light also stretches across the screen, as you can see in the photo above. There aren't any distracting reflections from strong light sources, meaning glare won't be an issue if you want to use it in a bright room. In theory, the reflection handling of the Dell AW3423DWF is remarkable. The slow roll-off is similar to the EOTF with those settings disabled even in 'HDR Peak 1000'. You can see the EOTF in the 'DisplayHDR True Black' mode with Console Mode and Source Tone Map disabled. The ABL is less aggressive in 'DisplayHDR True Black', meaning there isn't a distracting change in brightness when minimizing and maximizing windows like with 'HDR Peak 1000'. Console Mode and Source Tone Map were enabled for these too, and this was done with firmware M3B102: While the results above are within the 'HDR Peak 1000' mode, you can also see the results in the 'DisplayHDR True Black' mode, which targets a brightness of 400 cd/m². Only while playing Destiny 2 on the Xbox Series X did the real scene brightness get brighter, with a max of 765 cd/m². We did the testing with a PC with an NVIDIA RTX 3060 graphics card, and the brightness is the same even with an AMD RX 6600 XT graphics card. It's most distracting when minimizing and maximizing windows, but it isn't an issue with real content. Similar to the AW3423DW, it has an aggressive Automatic Brightness Limiter (ABL) that dims the screen when there are full-screen windows open in HDR. However, the EOTF is slightly different with both settings disabled, as there's a slower roll-off at the peak brightness, meaning it's tone mapping before the source does, causing highlights to be too dim. The firmware update also fixes the bug that caused colors to look washed out with Source Tone Map and Console Mode both disabled on previous firmware, as it performs nearly the same with those settings off with firmware M3B104. Before the update, the EOTF was brighter than the target. It makes the image a bit brighter, but the main difference is that the EOTF tracks closer to the target PQ curve, meaning it displays images at their intended brightness. These results are with firmware M3B104, released in June 2023. While some small highlights are around 1,000 cd/m², the overall real scene peak brightness is worse than the Dell Alienware AW3423DW. These results are in the 'HDR Peak 1000' Smart HDR mode with Console Mode and Source Tone Map both enabled. The Dell AW3423DWF has okay HDR brightness. Made it clear in the Refresh Rate box that you can reach a higher refresh rate with a 10-bit signal if you create a custom resolution.Ĭlarified text in the Build Quality, Ergonomics, and Flicker sections to be more precise about how the results impact the user. Also noted that we didn't experience any coil whine issue. We've added a comparison to the recently reviewed Samsung Odyssey OLED G8/G85SB S34BG85, which has a better maximum Refresh Rate across all inputs.Ĭlarified in Build Quality that this monitor indeed has an internal fan, but it's quiet and not as loud as the Dell Alienware AW3423DW. We uploaded the initial brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test. Retested the HDR Brightness after updating to firmware M3B103, and the monitor still performs the same. We uploaded the latest brightness measurements and uniformity photos for the Accelerated Longevity Test. It doesn't change much, but the bug that caused washed out colors is fixed. Retested the HDR Brightness, HDR Color Gamut, and HDR Color Volume after updating to firmware M3B104.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |